Document & claims processing
Extraction, classification, and human review that cuts handling time without losing the audit trail regulators expect.
HOW THIS WORKS: The audit is a real working session, not a sales call. You leave with the blueprint whether or not we go on to build anything together.
Architecture, delivery, and security — from one team.
The stack we build on
No procurement cycle, no six-week discovery phase, no vendor lock-in. Just a ranked opportunity map, a costed blueprint, and a team that builds it with you.
We walk your workflows, your data, and the tooling you already run. Every opportunity comes back ranked by payback period, effort, and risk. Thirty minutes in, you have a prioritised backlog instead of a pitch deck.
Reference architecture, model selection, guardrails, evaluation plan, and a costed rollout sequence — written down in enough detail that any competent team could execute it. Including yours, without us.
We build alongside your team in weekly loops. Design, engineering, evaluations, and security live in one thread — and every week closes with working software rather than a status update.
Not a gated demo. Every artefact, review, and channel our partners actually use to get AI from idea into production.
⚡The audit is free because it's how we scope real engagements. There's no obligation to continue, and the blueprint is yours either way.
Fair question. Most consultancies put a paywall in front of the thinking and save the real answers for after you've signed something. We do it the other way round.
So let me spell it out. We can't scope an AI engagement properly without doing the audit anyway. Every serious proposal we write starts with understanding your workflows, your data, and what your team can realistically absorb.
So we stopped pretending that work was a sales call and started giving it away. You get the useful part up front, and we get a scoped conversation instead of a guess.
Which means if the blueprint says the highest-value move is something you can build in-house, we'll tell you that — and you should go do it. If it says the payback isn't there yet, we'll tell you that too.
So for the cost of half an hour, you get:
That's it. No upsell, no artificial deadline, no “oh by the way we also sell a platform licence” at the end. We get paid when we build things that work, so the fastest route there is being straight with you now.
Capability, not case studies. This is the surface area a Strivon engagement covers, and the commitments that hold on every single one.
Six shapes of work that come up again and again. If yours looks like one of these, the audit will be fast — we already know which questions to ask.
Extraction, classification, and human review that cuts handling time without losing the audit trail regulators expect.
One place your team can ask questions of scattered policies, runbooks, and tickets — with permissions respected per user.
Routing, summarising, and drafting responses so agents open a conversation already halfway solved.
Account research, enrichment, and briefing notes generated on a schedule instead of the night before the meeting.
Matching, deduplicating, and flagging anomalies across systems that were never designed to agree with each other.
Replacing spreadsheet-and-email processes with something observable, permissioned, and genuinely faster to operate.
The stuff you're already wondering.
The audit and the blueprint are free. There is no card, no deposit, and no obligation to continue afterwards.
If you decide to build with us, we scope from the blueprint — so you are pricing a defined piece of work rather than an open-ended retainer. Most first engagements land as a fixed-scope pilot aimed at one workflow, which keeps the downside small and the payback measurable.
You also pay your own model and infrastructure costs directly to the provider. We size those in the blueprint so there are no surprises, and we design to keep them low.
It means one team owning the whole path from opportunity to production: the architecture, the build, the evaluations, and the security review.
The alternative most companies end up with is a strategy deck from one vendor, an implementation from another, and nobody accountable when the thing underperforms in month three. We would rather be the team that has to live with its own recommendations.
Three things. You talk to the engineers who write the code, not a layer of account managers above them. You get working software weekly rather than a deliverable at the end of a quarter. And the code, the infrastructure, and the IP are yours from day one.
We also say no. If the audit shows the payback is not there, or that your team could build it in-house faster than we could, that is what the blueprint will say. A consultancy paid by the hour has no reason to ever tell you that.
We will not quote you a percentage. Outcomes depend far more on your data quality and your team’s appetite for changing a process than on the model you pick.
What we commit to is measurability: every workflow we build gets a baseline before and a number after, so you can tell whether it worked. If it did not move the number, we would rather find that out in week three of a pilot than a year into a platform contract.
The projects that fail are almost always the ones where nobody agreed what success meant. That is why the audit starts there.
Yes — that is the common case, and usually the better one. Your team knows the domain and the existing systems; we bring the AI architecture and delivery patterns.
In practice that means shared repositories, joint design review, and code written to your standards rather than ours. The goal is that your team can maintain and extend everything after we step back, which is also why the handover documentation is part of the scope and not an optional extra.
Tell us what you're working on. We'll come back with a time and the questions we'd like to walk through.