I run a structured review at no cost for teams exploring AI in delivery, migration, decisioning, customer operations or enterprise technology. You bring one workflow and leave with a written summary that is yours to keep, whatever you decide next.
These are the questions I would ask in the first ten minutes anyway. Answer them here and I can read them before we meet, so the conversation begins with your situation instead of working its way towards it.
Candidate AI use cases drawn from the workflow itself, not a generic list.
Where the effort sits today, and which opportunities are worth taking seriously first.
Data quality, governance, explainability and the practical system boundaries.
A short, ordered list — including "not yet", where that is the honest answer.
The audit is a structured review of one workflow, not a full consulting engagement.
There is no procurement cycle and no six-week discovery exercise, just one workflow worked through in a structured conversation and a written summary you can act on with or without me.
I walk through one real workflow with you, looking at where the manual effort sits, what the data and system constraints are and which AI use cases could realistically apply. You leave with a shortlist rather than a pitch deck.
You receive a short written summary covering the practical opportunities, the likely business value, the governance and implementation risks and the next actions worth taking. It is written plainly enough to circulate internally without translation.
The summary is yours whether or not anything follows. The next step might sit with your own team, a workshop or focused advisory, and sometimes the honest answer is that the payback is not there yet.
Every summary follows the same structure whatever the workflow, so it is easy to share with the people who need to read it.
You get candidate use cases drawn from your actual workflow rather than a generic list of AI ideas.
You see which opportunities deserve serious attention first, measured against where the effort sits today.
I set out the constraints that would shape any implementation, from data quality and system boundaries to governance, explainability and practical limits.
You get a short, ordered set of next actions, including doing nothing yet where that is the honest answer.
There is no vendor pitch, no model leaderboard and no promise that cannot survive contact with a regulated environment.
It is a fair question. A lot of consulting puts a paywall in front of the thinking and saves the real answers for after you have signed something.
The honest reason is that an engagement cannot be scoped accurately without doing this work anyway. Understanding your workflow, your data and what your team can realistically absorb is the first thing any serious recommendation depends on.
So it stopped being a sales call and became something I simply give away. If the summary says the highest-value move is something you can build in-house, that is what it will say. If it says the payback is not there yet, it will say that too.

Being clear about this up front keeps the conversation useful for both of us.